Here`s a cropped picture comparison between the Sony a7S II and the Sony a7S in 4K resolution. The only difference I can see is that the 4K HDMI output does its standard Gamma adjustment while also significantly increasing contrast and saturation. When compared to external film, the internal footage from the Sony a7S II seems to be practically comparable. When comparing the a7S to the new a7S II, I can certainly notice more noise on the a7S at its lowest ISO setting.































After everything is said and done, the Sony a7S is the camera we`d choose if we were forced to select just one. It is the most powerful of the two cameras. In addition, unlike the a7S, the ISO of the a7II fell short of what customers had hoped for. Users seem to have been dissatisfied with the a7II`s low-light performance, which is not surprising given the reasons already mentioned. After a few years of usage, customers could confirm to the camera`s good functioning, which is really comforting to know.































As a result, as compared to other genres of photography, sports and action photographers tend to choose quicker and faster shutter speeds. The first is that, in comparison to the Sony a7S, the Sony a7II looks to be more of a photographic camera. Take a look at it; it has a resolution of 24 megapixels and is easier and more pleasant to handle and grip than previous models.































Sony says that the A7S II has the longest battery life of the three cameras, with 370 shots per charge when shooting with the LCD and 310 photos per charge when shooting with the EVF when using the EVF. A7 II follows closely behind with 350 photos taken via the LCD and 270 using the EVF, while A7R II achieves 340 pictures taken through the LCD and 290 images taken using the EVF - 20 more than the A7 II. For certain users, this app alone may be worth the price of the whole collection - read on to find out more about this in our evaluation. It has been my experience that many A7s films on YouTube and Vimeo do not display moiré, or at least not enough to be noticeable.































The two cameras are given in the order in which they are most closely related in size. There are three sequential viewpoints available: from the front, from the top, and from the rear. All measurements are given in millimeters, unless otherwise specified. The Sony a7II has a battery life that is just somewhat worse than that of the Sony a7S. In addition, the Sony a7S has a somewhat longer battery life than the Canon EOS R.































When showing advertisements for autos or motorcycles, this method may be utilized to give the sense of increased speed. We wouldn`t classify the Sony a7S as a photography camera, despite the fact that it is a fantastic camera. Because of the way this camera is constructed, as well as the functionality it offers, you`ll quickly discover that it wasn`t created specifically for photography in the first place. In terms of video recording, the Sony A7 II was a respectable pick, but it lacked the capability to film in 4K. Both choices are available on the newer A7 III model, as well as on the other two cameras.































693 phase-detection AF points are available and are as sensitive when using an A-mount lens via an adapter as when using a dedicated E-mount optic. These take up around 93 percent of the picture area and are joined by 425 tightly packed contrast-detect AF points, which help to increase overall accuracy even further. The selling point of Sony`s A7 III is that it incorporates the same autofocus innovations seen in the company`s A9 model, allowing it to catch unexpected moving things such as dancers and animals with pinpoint accuracy. The LCD panels on the three devices are absolutely comparable in terms of quality.































Increasing the number of focus points would be beneficial if they were continuously moving out of focus, since this would assist to guarantee that the finished picture was properly focused. The Sony a7II also outperforms the Sony a7S in a number of specialized areas. When you hold both cameras in your hands, you will notice that the a7II has a more comfortable grip and the controls are more intuitive.































Although there are a few improvements included into the new Sony a7S II, the most notable is the addition of 4K internal recording, which is the most significant change. Let`s examine how the two cameras compare in the lab; first, we`ll look at the specifications in theory, and then we`ll look at them in action. Below is a side-by-side comparison of the technical specifications of the two cameras, which should help you quickly assess their differences and similarities. The results of the preceding review should, however, be regarded with caution.































The editor of British Photographic Industry News, he has previously worked as the editor of Which Digital Camera and the deputy editor of Total Digital Photography. When you consider the intended user and applications, Sony says that the A7S II`s autofocus technology can acquire focus at an even lower –4EV – one full stop lower than that of its two brothers – and this makes a lot of sense. The A7R III is equipped with a back-illuminated sensor with a resolution of 42.2MP, which is much greater than the 24.2MP and 12.2MP sensors found in the A7 III and A7S II, respectively.































If the A7II reads each and every line, like the A7s does, aliasing should be completely removed. However, this may need the use of more processing power than the camera is capable of providing. When it comes to photography, the A7-ii is a better choice than the A7S, unless you plan on shooting at really high ISOs or doing astro photography with it. Using the appropriate video profiles, such as slog2 in the A7-ii, you may nearly completely eliminate moiré from your movie. The A7s will be somewhat superior in terms of overall performance - albeit this will be trivial for many.